Heart Attack Malpractice – When Timely and Life-Saving Care Was Not Given

By definition, a heart attack involves a portion of the heart muscle being cut off from oxygen. Tissue damage to the heart can start in minutes. And, the longer (and more severe) the damage to the heart, the greater the risk of an overall failure of circulation, putting the life of the patient in jeopardy. This is why, in all cases of suspected heart attack, the “standards” of care typically require urgent evaluation and treatment.

Many hospitals have a “cardiac catheterization team” (“Cath Team”) that is supposed to be mobilized once diagnosis of a blocked heart vessel appears a substantial possibility from early tests such as EKG.[3] The timely activation of the cardiac catheterization team is critical for heart attack patients. Delays in assembling the team can lead to worse outcomes, including increased heart damage and a higher risk of death. Our attorneys examine the events leading up to the delayed activation to ensure that those responsible are held accountable for their failure to act promptly.

The evidence to prove a strong case typically comes from the medical record itself, which will usually contain the timeline of initial presentation, description of symptoms and patient course in significant detail. Sometimes however, the record is incomplete — sometimes even incorrect. So we also listen to the timeline as presented by the family, to better assess if the record is credible. In addition, many objective tests (such as lab markers for heart damage, such as “troponin” tests, or EKG tests) will often allow us to pinpoint the onset and progression of cardiac damage, that may not have been appreciated by the medical providers.

Yes, you can potentially obtain compensation for damage caused by a heart attack if it was worsened by medical negligence. Compensation may cover medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages resulting from the delayed diagnosis or improper treatment. We can help determine if you have a valid claim for compensation. 

We handle each case with personalized attention, conducting thorough investigations, collaborating with world-class medical experts, and meticulous attention to detail to achieve the best possible outcome for our clients. 

During your free consultation, we’ll obtain an overview of your situation. If it appears that the matter may involve malpractice, we will then typically order/obtain your records, and do a more in-depth evaluation, including through consultation with medical experts. From that point, we will then discuss further with you our findings and recommendations.

In New York, the statute of limitations for filing a heart attack malpractice claim is generally two and one-half years from the date of the injury. However, there are exceptions, including some short (90-day) “notice” requirements for some municipal entities, So, it’s crucial to consult with experienced malpractice counsel in New York as soon as possible. 

Yes, we offer free consultations to evaluate your case and discuss your legal options. There is no obligation to proceed after the consultation. 

We keep our clients informed throughout the process. Our team provides regular updates, explains each step clearly, and addresses any questions or concerns you may have. We’re committed to maintaining open and transparent communication so you always know the status of your case.